Huey sent this: http://thestar.com.my/metro/story.asp?file=/2011/7/13/north/9092295&sec=North
I'm quite lost for words.
WHO would have so much time to do a thing like this? Seems like a case of mischief, but at the expense of using animals, which is exploitation. Seems like the work of a real pest.
You know, aeons ago, humans lived quite harmoniously (meaning, by the laws of nature) with the animals in the jungle.
Then, humans became "civilised", created villages, and domesticated some of the animals as pets (the wolves and wild cats).
"Be our companions, and we'll look after you" was the deal, which became a covenant honoured by the animals, but quickly forgotten by the humans.
Then, these pets bred uncontrollably, and humans dumped them. That's how they became strays in our modern towns and cities now.
If only our ancestors had not domesticated them, all animals would live by the laws of nature in the jungle, and we humans will live in our villages and towns, and all would be well. There would be no stray problem then.
But if humans clear the jungles and destroy the natural habitats of the animals, then yes, the animals would migrate out to our towns and cities and we'll shout foul again: PESTS!! PESTS!! Get rid of them!!
So, who is the real PEST here?
More Articles By AnimalCare
|
|
There are currently no comments available
Want to comment on this blog post? Sign up to PetFinder now or login at the top to join the discussion!
|
|
Member Login
